AskDefine | Define planet

Dictionary Definition



1 any of the celestial bodies (other than comets or satellites) that revolve around the sun in the solar system
2 a person who follows or serves another [syn: satellite]

User Contributed Dictionary



From planeta, planetes < sc=polytonic variant of sc=polytonic.



  1. In the context of "obsolete|historical|,|or|astrology": Each of the seven major bodies which move relative to the fixed stars in the night sky—the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn.
  2. Any of various rocky or gaseous spherical bodies orbiting the Sun, specifically the eight major bodies of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. The Galilean moons, four asteroids and the dwarf planet Pluto were formerly included, in the 17th, 19th and 20th centuries respectively.
  3. In the context of "astronomy|by extension": Any similar spherically-shaped body, in orbit around a star or binary star, which dominates its orbit in size but is not massive enough for fusion.


each of the seven major bodies which move relative to the fixed stars in the night sky
  • Arabic: (káukab)
  • Armenian: մոլորակ (molorak)
  • Bulgarian: планета
  • Catalan: planeta
  • Chinese: 行星
  • Croatian: planet
  • Czech: planeta
  • Danish: planet
  • Dutch: planeet
  • Estonian: planeet
  • Finnish: planeetta
  • French: planète
  • German: Planet, Wandelstern qualifier old
  • Hungarian: bolygó, planéta
  • Italian: pianeta
  • Japanese: 惑星 (わくせい, wakusei)
  • Korean: 행성 (行星, haengseong), 위성 (wiseong)
  • Latvian: planēta
  • Malay: planet
  • Occitan: planeta
  • Polish: planeta
  • Portuguese: planeta
  • Russian: планета
  • Spanish: planeta
  • Swedish: planet
  • Telugu: గ్రహము (grahamu)
  • Thai: (dāw-nop-khroh)
  • Turkish: gezegen
  • Ukrainian: планета
  • West Frisian: planeet
rocky or gaseous spherical bodies orbiting the Sun
  • Arabic: (káukab)
  • Armenian: մոլորակ (molorak)
  • Bulgarian: планета
  • Chinese: 行星
  • Croatian: planet
  • Czech: planeta
  • Danish: planet
  • Dutch: planeet
  • Estonian: planeet
  • Finnish: planeetta
  • French: planète
  • German: Planet
  • Hungarian: bolygó, planéta
  • Icelandic: reikistjarna, pláneta
  • Italian: pianeta
  • Japanese: 惑星 (わくせい, wakusei)
  • Korean: 행성 [行星] (haengseong), 위성 (wiseong)
  • Latvian: planēta
  • Malay: planet
  • Polish: planeta
  • Portuguese: planeta
  • Russian: планета
  • Spanish: planeta
  • Swedish: planet
  • Telugu: గ్రహము (grahamu)
  • Thai: (dāw-nop-khroh)
  • Turkish: gezegen
  • Ukrainian: планета
  • West Frisian: planeet
similar spherically-shaped body, in orbit around a star
  • Arabic: (káukab)
  • Armenian: մոլորակ (molorak)
  • Bulgarian: планета
  • Chinese: 行星 (xíngxīng)
  • Croatian: planet
  • Czech: planeta
  • Danish: planet
  • Dutch: planeet
  • Estonian: planeet
  • Finnish: planeetta
  • French: planète
  • German: Planet
  • Hungarian: bolygó, planéta
  • Icelandic: reikistjarna, pláneta
  • Italian: pianeta
  • Japanese: 惑星 (わくせい, wakusei)
  • Korean: 행성 [行星] (haengseong), 위성 (wiseong)
  • Latvian: planēta
  • Malay: planet
  • Polish: planeta
  • Portuguese: planeta
  • Russian: планета
  • Spanish: planeta
  • Swedish: planet
  • Telugu: గ్రహము (grahamu)
  • Thai: (dāw-nop-khroh)
  • Turkish: gezegen
  • Ukrainian: планета
  • West Frisian: planeet


  • First Steps to Astronomy and Geography 1828, (Hatchard & Son: Piccadilly, London)



hr-noun m





  1. planet


Extensive Definition

A planet, as defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), is a celestial body orbiting a star or stellar remnant that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion, and has cleared its neighbouring region of planetesimals.
The term planet is an ancient one having ties to history, science, myth, and religion. The planets were originally seen as a divine presence; as emissaries of the gods. Even today, many people continue to believe the movement of the planets affects their lives, although such a causation is rejected by the scientific community. As scientific knowledge advanced, the human perception of the planets changed over time, incorporating a number of disparate objects. Even now there is no uncontested definition of what a planet is. In 2006, the IAU officially adopted a resolution defining planets within the Solar System. This definition has been both praised and criticized, and remains disputed by some scientists.
The planets were initially thought to orbit the Earth in circular motions; after the development of the telescope, the planets were determined to orbit the Sun, and their orbits were found to be elliptical. As observational tools improved, astronomers saw that, like Earth, the planets rotated around tilted axes and some share such features as ice-caps and seasons. Since the dawn of the Space Age, close observation by probes has found that Earth and the other planets share characteristics such as volcanism, hurricanes, tectonics and even hydrology. Since 1992, through the discovery of hundreds of extrasolar planets (planets around other stars), scientists are beginning to observe similar features throughout the Milky Way Galaxy.
Under IAU definitions, there are eight planets in the Solar System (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) and 277 known extrasolar ones. The Solar System also contains at least three dwarf planets (Ceres, Pluto, and Eris). Many of these planets are orbited by one or more moons, which can be larger than small planets. Planets are generally divided into two main types: large, low-density gas giants and smaller, rocky terrestrials.


The idea of planets has evolved over its history, from the divine wandering stars of antiquity to the earthly objects of the scientific age. The concept has also now expanded to include worlds not only in our Solar System, but in hundreds of other extrasolar systems. The ambiguities inherent in defining planets have led to much scientific controversy.


seealso Geocentric model In ancient times, astronomers noted how certain lights moved across the sky in relation to the other stars. Ancient Greeks called these lights "πλάνητες ἀστέρες" (planetes asteres: wandering stars) or simply "πλανήτοι" (planētoi: wanderers), from which the today's word "planet" was derived. it was almost universally believed that Earth was in the centre of the Universe and that all the "planets" circled the Earth. The reasons for this perception was that stars and planets appeared to revolve around the Earth each day, and the apparently common sense perception that the Earth was solid and stable and that it is not moving but at rest.
The Greek cosmological system was taken from that of the Babylonians, In the 6th century BC, the Babylonians had a highly advanced level of astronomical knowledge, and had a theory of the planets centuries before the ancient Greeks. The oldest planetary astronomical text that we possess is the Babylonian Venus tablet of Ammisaduqa, a 7th century BC copy of a list of observations of the motions of the planet Venus that probably dates as early as the second millennium BC. The Enuma anu enlil, written during the Neo-Assyrian period in the 7th century BC, comprises a list of omens and their relationships with various celestial phenomena including the motions of the planets. Sumerians, predecessors of Babylonians which are credited as one of the first civilizations and the inventors of writing, had identified at least Venus by 1500 BC. Conversely, there is no evidence of knowledge of the planets in the earliest written Greek sources, such as the Iliad and the Odyssey.

Modern times

seealso Heliocentrism
The five naked-eye planets have been known since ancient times, and have had a significant impact on mythology, religious cosmology, and ancient astronomy. As scientific knowledge progressed, however, understanding of the term "planet" changed from something that moved across the sky (in relation to the star field); to a body that orbited the Earth (or that were believed to do so at the time); and in the 16th century to something that directly orbited the Sun when the heliocentric model of Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler gained sway.
Thus the Earth became included in the list of planets, Until the mid-19th century, the number of "planets" rose rapidly since any newly discovered object directly orbiting the Sun was listed as a planet by the scientific community.
In the 19th century astronomers began to realize that recently discovered bodies that had been classified as planets for almost half a century (such as Ceres, Pallas, and Vesta), were very different from the traditional one. These bodies shared the same region of space between Mars and Jupiter (the Asteroid belt), and had a much smaller mass; as a result they were reclassified as "asteroids". In the absence of any formal definition, a "planet" came to be understood as any "large" body that orbited the Sun. Since there was a dramatic size gap between the asteroids and the planets, and the spate of new discoveries seemed to have ended after the discovery of Neptune in 1846, there was no apparent need to have a formal definition.
However, in the 20th century, Pluto was discovered. After initial observations led to the belief it was larger than Earth, the object was immediately accepted as the ninth planet. Further monitoring found the body was actually much smaller: in 1936, Raymond Lyttleton suggested that Pluto may be an escaped satellite of Neptune, and Fred Whipple suggested in 1964 that Pluto may be a comet. However, as it was still larger than all known asteroids and seemingly did not exist within a larger population, it kept its status until 2006.
In the 1990s and early 2000s, there was a flood of discoveries of similar objects in the same region of the Solar System (the Kuiper belt). Like Ceres and the asteroids before it, Pluto was found to be just one small body in a population of thousands. A growing number of astronomers argued for it to be declassified as a planet, since many similar objects approaching its size were found. The discovery of Eris, a more massive object widely publicised as the "tenth planet", brought things to a head. The IAU set about creating the definition of planet, and eventually produced one in 2006. The number of planets dropped to the eight significantly larger bodies that had cleared their orbit (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus & Neptune), and a new class of dwarf planets was created, initially containing three objects (Ceres, Pluto and Eris).
In 1992, astronomers Aleksander Wolszczan and Dale Frail announced the discovery of planets around a pulsar, PSR B1257+12. This discovery is generally considered to be the first definitive detection of a planetary system around another star. Then, on October 6 1995, Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz of the University of Geneva announced the first definitive detection of an exoplanet orbiting an ordinary main-sequence star (51 Pegasi).
The discovery of extrasolar planets led to another ambiguity in defining a planet; the point at which a planet becomes a star. Many known extrasolar planets are many times the mass of Jupiter, approaching that of stellar objects known as "brown dwarfs". Brown dwarfs are generally considered stars due to their ability to fuse deuterium, a heavier isotope of hydrogen. While stars more massive than 75 times that of Jupiter fuse hydrogen, stars of only 13 Jupiter masses can fuse deuterium. However, deuterium is quite rare, and most brown dwarfs would have ceased fusing deuterium long before their discovery, making them effectively indistinguishable from supermassive planets.
As large Kuiper belt and scattered disc objects were discovered in the late 1990s and early years of the twenty-first century, a number including Quaoar, Sedna and Eris were heralded in the popular press as the 'tenth planet', however none of these received widespread scientific recognition as such, although Eris has now been classified as a Dwarf Planet.

Former classifications

The table below lists Solar System bodies formerly considered to be planets:

Modern definition

With the discovery during the latter half of the 20th century of more objects within the Solar System and large objects around other stars, disputes arose over what should constitute a planet. There was particular disagreement over whether an object should be considered a planet if it was part of a distinct population such as a belt, or if it was large enough to generate energy by the thermonuclear fusion of deuterium.
In 2003, The International Astronomical Union (IAU) Working Group on Extrasolar Planets made a position statement on the definition of a planet that incorporated a working definition:
|275px|The largest Trans-Neptunian objects that prompted the IAU's 2006 decision
  1. Earth
rect 646 1714 2142 1994 The Earth
  1. Eris and Dysnomia
circle 226 412 16 Dysnomia circle 350 626 197 (136199) Eris
  1. Pluto and Charon
circle 1252 684 86 Charon circle 1038 632 188 (134340) Pluto
  1. 2005 FY9
circle 1786 614 142 (136472) 2005 FY9
  1. 2003 EL61
circle 2438 616 155 (136108) 2003 EL61
  1. Sedna
circle 342 1305 137 (90377) Sedna
  1. Orcus
circle 1088 1305 114 (90482) Orcus
  1. Quaoar
circle 1784 1305 97 (50000) Quaoar
  1. Varuna
circle 2420 1305 58 (20000) Varuna
desc none
  1. - setting this to "bottom-right" will display a (rather large) icon linking to the graphic, if desired
  1. Notes:
  2. Details on the new coding for clickable images is here: mw:Extension:ImageMap
  3. While it may look strange, it's important to keep the codes for a particular system in order. The clickable coding treats the first object created in an area as the one on top.
  4. Moons should be placed on "top" so that their smaller circles won't disappear "under" their respective primaries.
  1. Objects with true masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium (currently calculated to be 13 times the mass of Jupiter for objects with the same isotopic abundance as the Sun) that orbit stars or stellar remnants are "planets" (no matter how they formed). The minimum mass and size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in our Solar System.
  2. Substellar objects with true masses above the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are "brown dwarfs", no matter how they formed or where they are located.
  3. Free-floating objects in young star clusters with masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are not "planets", but are "sub-brown dwarfs" (or whatever name is most appropriate).
This definition has since been widely used by astronomers when publishing discoveries in academic journals. Although temporary, it remains an effective, working definition until a more permanent one is formally adopted. Nevertheless, it did not address the dispute over the lower mass limit, and steered clear of the controversy regarding objects within the Solar System.
This matter was finally addressed during the 2006 meeting of the IAU's General Assembly. After much debate and one failed proposal, the assembly voted to pass a resolution that defined planets within the Solar System as:
Under this definition, the Solar System is considered to have eight planets. Bodies which fulfill the first two conditions but not the third (such as Pluto and Eris) are classified as dwarf planets, providing they are not also natural satellites of other planets. Originally an IAU committee had proposed a definition that would have included a much larger number of planets as it did not include (c) as a criterion. After much discussion, it was decided via a vote that those bodies should instead be classified as dwarf planets.
This definition is based in modern theories of planetary formation, in which planetary embryos initially clear their orbital neighborhood of other smaller objects. As described by astronomer Steven Soter:
In the aftermath of the IAU's 2006 vote, there has been criticism of the new definition, and some astronomers have even stated that they will not use it. Part of the dispute centres around the belief that point (c) (clearing its orbit) should not have been listed, and that those objects now categorised as dwarf planets should actually be part of a broader planetary definition. The next IAU conference is not until 2009, when modifications could be made to the definition, also possibly including extrasolar planets.
Beyond the scientific community, Pluto has held a strong cultural significance for many in the general public considering its planetary status during most of the 20th century – similarly to Ceres and its kin in the 1800s. The discovery of Eris was widely reported in the media as the "tenth planet" and therefore the reclassification of all three objects as dwarf planets has attracted a lot of media and public attention.


The names for the planets in the Western world are derived from the naming practices of the Romans, which ultimately derive from those of the Greeks and the Babylonians. In ancient Greece, the two great luminaries the Sun and the Moon were called Helios and Selene; the farthest planet was called Phainon, the shiner; followed by Phaethon, "bright"; the red planet was known as Pyroeis, the "fiery"; the brightest was known as Phosphoros, the light bringer; and the fleeting final planet was called Stilbon, the gleamer. The Greeks also made each planet sacred to one of their pantheon of gods, the Olympians: Helios and Selene were the names of both planets and gods; Phainon was sacred to Kronos, the Titan who fathered the Olympians; Phaethon was sacred to Zeús, Kronos's son who deposed him as king; Pyroeis was given to Ares, son of Zeus and god of war; Phosphorus was ruled by Aphrodite, the goddess of love; and Hermes, messenger of the gods and god of learning and wit, ruled over Stilbon.
The Greek practice of grafting of their gods' names onto the planets was almost certainly borrowed from the Babylonians. The Babylonians named Phosphorus after their goddess of love, Ishtar; Pyroeis after their god of war, Nergal, Stilbon after their god of wisdom Nabu, and Phaethon after their chief god, Marduk. There are too many concordances between Greek and Babylonian naming conventions for them to have arisen separately.
Today, most people in the western world know the planets by names derived from the Olympian pantheon of gods. While modern Greeks still use their ancient names for the planets, other European languages, because of the influence of the Roman Empire and, later, the Catholic Church, use the Roman (or Latin) names rather than the Greek ones. The Romans, who, like the Greeks, were Indo-Europeans, shared with them a common pantheon under different names but lacked the rich narrative traditions that Greek poetic culture had given their gods. During the later period of the Roman Republic, Roman writers borrowed much of the Greek narratives and applied them to their own pantheon, to the point where they became virtually indistinguishable. When the Romans studied Greek astronomy, they gave the planets their own gods' names: Mercurius (for Hermes), Venus (Aphrodite), Mars (Ares), Iuppiter (Zeus) and Saturnus (Kronos). When subsequent planets were discovered in the 18th and 19th centuries, the naming practice was retained: Uranus (Ouranos) and Neptūnus (Poseidon).
Some Romans, following a belief possibly originating in Mesopotamia but developed in Hellenistic Egypt, believed that the seven gods after whom the planets were named took hourly shifts in looking after affairs on Earth. The order of shifts went Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Moon (from the farthest to the closest planet). Therefore, the first day was started by Saturn (1st hour), second day by Sun (25th hour), followed by Moon (49th hour), Mars, Mercury, Jupiter and Venus. Since each day was named by the god that started it, this is also the order of the days of the week in the Roman calendar – and still preserved many modern languages. Sunday, Monday, and Saturday are straightforward translations of these Roman names. In English the other days were renamed after Tiw, (Tuesday) Wóden (Wednesday), Thunor (Thursday), and Fríge (Friday), the Anglo-Saxon gods considered similar or equivalent to Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, and Venus respectively.
Since Earth was only generally accepted as a planet in the 17th century, there is no tradition of naming it after a god (the same is true, in English at least, of the Sun and the Moon, though they are no longer considered planets). The name originates from the 8th century Anglo-Saxon word erda, which means ground or soil and was first used in writing as the name of the sphere of the Earth perhaps around 1300. It is the only planet whose name in English is not derived from greco-roman mythology. Many of the Romance languages retain the old Roman word terra (or some variation of it) that was used with the meaning of "dry land" (as opposed to "sea"). However, the non-Romance languages use their own respective native words. The Greeks retain their original name, Γή (Ge or Yi); the Germanic languages, including English, use a variation of an ancient Germanic word ertho, "ground," After a planet reaches a diameter larger than the Earth's moon, it begins to accumulate an extended atmosphere, greatly increasing the capture rate of the planetesimals by means of atmospheric drag.
When the protostar has grown such that it ignites to form a star, the surviving disk is removed from the inside outward by photoevaporation, the solar wind, Poynting-Robertson drag and other effects. Thereafter there still may be many protoplanets orbiting the star or each other, but over time many will collide, either to form a single larger planet or release material for other larger protoplanets or planets to absorb. Those objects that have become massive enough will capture most matter in their orbital neighbourhoods to become planets. Meanwhile, protoplanets that have avoided collisions may become natural satellites of planets through a process of gravitational capture, or remain in belts of other objects to become either dwarf planets or small Solar System bodies.
The energetic impacts of the smaller planetesimals (as well as radioactive decay) will heat up the growing planet, causing it to at least partially melt. The interior of the planet begins to differentiate by mass, developing a denser core. Smaller terrestrial planets lose most of their atmospheres because of this accretion, but the lost gases can be replaced by outgassing from the mantle and from the subsequent impact of comets. (Smaller planets will lose any atmosphere they gain through various escape mechanisms.)
With the discovery and observation of planetary systems around stars other than our own, it is becoming possible to elaborate, revise or even replace this account. The level of metallicity – an astronomical term describing the abundance of chemical elements with an atomic number greater than 2 (helium) – is now believed to determine the likelihood that a star will have planets. Hence it is thought less likely that a metal-poor, population II star will possess a more substantial planetary system than a metal-rich population I star.

Solar System

According to the IAU's current definitions, there are eight planets in the Solar System. In increasing distance from the Sun, they are:
  1. !style="font-size: smaller;"|Rotation period(days)
!style="font-size: smaller;"|Namedmoons !style="font-size: smaller;"|Rings !style="font-size: smaller;"|Atmosphere |- ! rowspan=4 style="background: #DDEEFF;" | Terrestrials | Mercury | align="center" | 0.382 | align="center" | 0.06 | align="center" | 0.39 | align="center" | 0.24 | align="center" | 3.38 | align="center" | 0.206 | align="center" | 58.64 | align="center" | — | align="center" | no | align="center" | minimal |- | Venus | align="center" | 0.949 | align="center" | 0.82 | align="center" | 0.72 | align="center" | 0.62 | align="center" | 3.86 | align="center" | 0.007 | align="center" | -243.02 | align="center" | — | align="center" | no | align="center" | CO2, N2 |- | Earth | align="center" | 1.00 | align="center" | 1.00 | align="center" | 1.00 | align="center" | 1.00 | align="center" | 7.25 | align="center" | 0.017 | align="center" | 1.00 | align="center" | 1 | align="center" | no | align="center" | N2, O2 |- | Mars | align="center" | 0.532 | align="center" | 0.11 | align="center" | 1.52 | align="center" | 1.88 | align="center" | 5.65 | align="center" | 0.093 | align="center" | 1.03 | align="center" | 2 | align="center" | no | align="center" | CO2, N2 |- ! rowspan=4 style="background: #DDEEFF;" | Gas giants | Jupiter | align="center" | 11.209 | align="center" | 317.8 | align="center" | 5.20 | align="center" | 11.86 | align="center" | 6.09 | align="center" | 0.048 | align="center" | 0.41 | align="center" | 63 | align="center" | yes | align="center" | H2, He |- | Saturn | align="center" | 9.449 | align="center" | 95.2 | align="center" | 9.54 | align="center" | 29.46 | align="center" | 5.51 | align="center" | 0.054 | align="center" | 0.43 | align="center" | 60 | align="center" | yes | align="center" | H2, He |- | Uranus | align="center" | 4.007 | align="center" | 14.6 | align="center" | 19.22 | align="center" | 84.01 | align="center" | 6.48 | align="center" | 0.047 | align="center" | -0.72 | align="center" | 27 | align="center" | yes | align="center" | H2, He |- | Neptune | align="center" | 3.883 | align="center" | 17.2 | align="center" | 30.06 | align="center" | 164.8 | align="center" | 6.43 | align="center" | 0.009 | align="center" | 0.67 | align="center" | 13 | align="center" | yes | align="center" | H2, He |- |colspan=12 style="background: #FFFFFF; border-right:1px solid white; border-bottom:1px solid white; border-left:1px solid white;"|
Measured relative to the Earth.
See Earth article for absolute values.

Dwarf planets

Before the August 2006 decision, several objects were proposed by astronomers, including at one stage by the IAU, as planets. However in 2006 several of these objects were reclassified as dwarf planets, objects distinct from planets. Currently three dwarf planets in the Solar System are recognized by the IAU: Ceres, Pluto and Eris. Several other objects in both the Asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt are under consideration, with as many as 50 that could eventually qualify. There may be as many as 200 that could be discovered once the Kuiper belt has been fully explored. Dwarf planets share many of the same characteristics as planets, although notable differences remain – namely that they are not dominant in their orbits. Their attributes are:
By definition, all dwarf planets are members of larger populations. Ceres is the largest body in the asteroid belt, while Pluto is a member of the Kuiper belt and Eris is a member of the scattered disc. Scientists such as Mike Brown believe that there may soon be over forty trans-Neptunian objects that qualify as dwarf planets under the IAU's recent definition.

Extrasolar planets

The first confirmed discovery of an extrasolar planet orbiting an ordinary main-sequence star occurred on 6 October 1995, when Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz of the University of Geneva announced the detection of an exoplanet around 51 Pegasi. Of the 270 extrasolar planets discovered by January 2008, most have masses which are comparable to or larger than Jupiter's, though masses ranging from just below that of Mercury to many times Jupiter's mass. The smallest extrasolar planets found to date have been discovered orbiting burned-out star remnants called pulsars, such as PSR B1257+12. There have been roughly a dozen extrasolar planets found of between 10 and 20 Earth masses, These planets have been nicknamed "Neptunes" because they roughly approximate that planet's mass (17 Earths). Another new category are the so-called "super-Earths", possibly terrestrial planets far larger than Earth but smaller than Neptune or Uranus. To date, five possible super-Earths have been found: Gliese 876 d, which is roughly six times Earth's mass, OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb and MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb, frigid icy worlds discovered through gravitational microlensing, and two planets orbiting the nearby red dwarf Gliese 581. Gliese 581 d is roughly 7.7 times Earth's mass, while Gliese 581 c is five times Earth's mass and the first terrestrial planet found within a star's habitable zone.
It is far from clear if the newly discovered large planets would resemble the gas giants in the Solar System or if they are of an entirely different type as yet unknown, like ammonia giants or carbon planets. In particular, some of the newly-discovered planets, known as hot Jupiters, orbit extremely close to their parent stars, in nearly circular orbits. They therefore receive much more stellar radiation than the gas giants in the Solar System, which makes it questionable whether they are the same type of planet at all. There may also exist a class of hot Jupiters, called Chthonian planets, that orbit so close to their star that their atmospheres have been blown away completely by stellar radiation. While many hot Jupiters have been found in the process of losing their atmospheres, as of 2008, no genuine cthonian planets have been discovered.
More detailed observation of extrasolar planets will require a new generation of instruments, including space telescopes. Currently the COROT spacecraft is searching for stellar luminosity variations due to transiting planets. Several projects have also been proposed to create an array of space telescopes to search for extrasolar planets with masses comparable to the Earth. These include the proposed NASA's Kepler Mission, Terrestrial Planet Finder, and Space Interferometry Mission programs, the ESA's Darwin, and the CNES' PEGASE. The New Worlds Mission is an occulting device that may work in conjunction with the James Webb Space Telescope. However, funding for some of these projects remains uncertain. The first spectra of extrasolar planets were reported in February 2007 (HD 209458 b and HD 189733 b). The frequency of occurrence of such terrestrial planets is one of the variables in the Drake equation which estimates the number of intelligent, communicating civilizations that exist in our galaxy.

Interstellar "planets"

Several computer simulations of stellar and planetary system formation have suggested that some objects of planetary mass would be ejected into interstellar space. Some scientists have argued that such objects found roaming in deep space should be classed as "planets". However, others have suggested that they could be low-mass stars. The IAU's working definition on extrasolar planets takes no position on the issue.
In 2005, astronomers announced the discovery of Cha 110913-773444, the smallest brown dwarf found to date, at only seven times Jupiter's mass. Since it was not found in orbit around a fusing star, it is a sub-brown dwarf according to the IAU's working definition. However, some astronomers believe it should be referred to as a planet.


Although each planet has unique physical characteristics, a number of broad commonalities do exist between them. Some of these characteristics, such as rings or natural satellites, have only as yet been observed in planets in the Solar System, whilst others are also common to extrasolar planets.

Dynamic characteristics


All planets revolve around stars. In the Solar System, all the planets orbit in the same direction as the Sun rotates. It is not yet known whether all extrasolar planets follow this pattern. The period of one revolution of a planet's orbit is known as its sidereal period or year. A planet's year depends on its distance from its star; the farther a planet is from its star, not only the longer the distance it must travel, but also the slower its speed, as it is less affected by the star's gravity. Because no planet's orbit is perfectly circular, the distance of each varies over the course of its year. The closest approach to its star is called its periastron (perihelion in the Solar System), while its farthest separation from the star is called its apastron (aphelion). As a planet approaches periastron, its speed increases as the pull of its star's gravity strengthens; as it reaches apastron, its speed decreases.
Each planet's orbit is delineated by a set of elements:
  • The eccentricity of an orbit describes how elongated a planet's orbit is. Planets with low eccentricities have more circular orbits, while planets with high eccentricities have more elliptical orbits. The planets in our Solar System have very low eccentricities, and thus nearly circular orbits.
  • The semi-major axis is the distance from a planet to the half-way point along the longest diameter of its elliptical orbit (see image). This distance is not the same as its apasteron, as no planet's orbit has its star at its exact centre. The eight planets of our Solar System all lie very close to the ecliptic; comets and Kuiper belt objects like Pluto are at far more extreme angles to it. The points at which a planet crosses above and below its reference plane are called its ascending and descending nodes. Among extrasolar planets, axial tilts are not known for certain, though most hot Jupiters are believed to possess negligible to no axial tilt, as a result of their proximity to their stars.


The planets also rotate around invisible axes through their centres. A planet's rotation period is known as its day. All planets in the Solar System rotate in a counter-clockwise direction, except for Venus, which rotates clockwise (Uranus is generally said to be rotating clockwise as well though because of its extreme axial tilt, it can be said to be rotating either clockwise or anti-clockwise, depending on whether one states it to be inclined 82° from the ecliptic in one direction, or 98° in the opposite direction). There is great variation in the length of day between the planets, with Venus taking 243 Earth days to rotate, and the gas giants only a few hours. The rotational periods of extrasolar planets are not known; however their proximity to their stars means that hot Jupiters are tidaly locked (their orbits are in sync with their rotations). This means they only ever show one face to their stars, with one side in perpetual day, the other in perpetual night.

Orbital clearance

The defining dynamic characteristic of a planet is that it has cleared its neighborhood. A planet that has cleared its neighborhood has accumulated enough mass to gather up or sweep away all the planetesimals in its orbit. In effect, it orbits its star in isolation, as opposed to sharing its orbit with a multitude of similar-sized objects. This characteristic was mandated as part of the IAU's official definition of a planet in August, 2006. This criterion excludes such planetary bodies as Pluto, Eris and Ceres from full-fledged planethood, making them instead dwarf planets.

Physical characteristics


A planet's defining physical characteristic is that it is massive enough for the force of its own gravity to dominate over the electromagnetic forces binding its physical structure, leading to a state of hydrostatic equilibrium. This effectively means that all planets are spherical or spheroidal. Up to a certain mass, an object can be irregular in shape, but beyond that point, which varies depending on the chemical makeup of the object, gravity begins to pull an object towards its own centre of mass until the object collapses into a sphere.
Mass is also the prime attribute by which planets are distinguished from stars. The upper mass limit for planethood is roughly 13 times Jupiter's mass, beyond which it achieves conditions suitable for nuclear fusion. Other than the Sun, no objects of such mass exist in our Solar System; however a number of extrasolar planets lie at that threshold. The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia lists several planets that are close to this limit: HD 38529c, AB Pictorisb, HD 162020b, and HD 13189b. A number of objects of higher mass are also listed, but since they lie above the fusion threshold, they would be better described as brown dwarfs. but in the gas giants the mantle simply dissolves into the upper cloud layers. The terrestrial planets possess cores of magnetic elements such as iron and nickel, and mantles of silicates. Jupiter and Saturn are believed to possess cores of rock and metal surrounded by mantles of metallic hydrogen. Uranus and Neptune, which are smaller, possess rocky cores surrounded by mantles of water, ammonia, methane and other ices. The fluid action within these planets' cores creates a geodynamo that generates a magnetic field. The composition of the Earth's atmosphere is different from the other planets because the various life processes that have transpired on the planet have introduced free molecular oxygen. The only solar planet without a true atmosphere is Mercury which had it mostly, although not entirely, blasted away by the solar wind.
Planetary atmospheres are affected by the varying degrees of energy received from either the Sun or their interiors, leading to the formation of dynamic weather systems such as hurricanes, (on Earth), planet-wide dust storms (on Mars), an Earth-sized anticyclone on Jupiter (called the Great Red Spot), and holes in the atmosphere (on Neptune).
Hot Jupiters have been shown to be losing their atmospheres into space due to stellar radiation, much like the tails of comets. These planets may have vast differences in temperature between their day and night sides which produce supersonic winds, although the day and night sides of HD 189733b appear to have very similar temperatures, indicating that that planet's atmosphere effectively redistributes the star's energy around the planet.
In 2004, a team of astronomers in Hawaii observed an extrasolar planet around the star HD 179949, which appeared to be creating a sunspot on the surface of its parent star. The team hypothesised that the planet's magnetosphere was transferring energy onto the star's surface increasing its already high 14,000 degree surface temperature by an additional 750 degrees.

Secondary characteristics

Planets in our Solar System possess orbital resonances in their own right. All except Mercury and Venus have natural satellites, often called "moons." Earth has one, and Mars has two, and the gas giants have numerous moons in complex planetary systems. Many gas giant moons have similar features to the terrestrial planets and dwarf planets, and some have been studied for signs of life (especially Europa).
The four gas giants are also orbited by planetary rings of varying size and complexity. The rings are composed primarily of dust or particulate matter, but can host tiny 'moonlets' whose gravity shapes and maintains their structure. Although the origins of planetary rings is not precisely known, they are believed to be the result of natural satellites that fell below their parent planet's Roche limit and were torn apart by tidal forces.
No secondary characteristics have been observed around extrasolar planets. However the sub-brown dwarf Cha 110913-773444, which has been described as a rogue planet, is believed to be orbited by a tiny protoplanetary disc.


This definition is drawn from two separate IAU declarations; a formal definition agreed by the Union in 2006, and an informal working definition established by the Union in 2003. The 2006 definition, while official, applies only to our Solar System, while the 2003 definition applies to planets around other stars. The extrasolar planet issue was deemed too complex to resolve at the 2006 IAU conference. Referred to by Huygens as a Planetes novus ("new planet") in his Systema Saturnium Both labelled nouvelles planètes (new planets) by Cassini in his Découverte de deux nouvelles planetes autour de Saturne Both once referred to as "planets" by Cassini in his An Extract of the Journal Des Scavans.... The term "satellite", however, had already begun to be used to distinguish such bodies from those around which they orbited ("primary planets"). Recently reclassified as a dwarf planet in 2006. Regarded as a planet from its discovery in 1930 until redesignated as a trans-Neptunian dwarf planet in August 2006.
planet in Afrikaans: Planeet
planet in Tosk Albanian: Planet
planet in Arabic: كوكب
planet in Franco-Provençal: Planèta
planet in Asturian: Planeta
planet in Bengali: গ্রহ
planet in Min Nan: He̍k-chheⁿ
planet in Banyumasan: Planet
planet in Belarusian: Планета
planet in Belarusian (Tarashkevitsa): Плянэта
planet in Bosnian: Planeta
planet in Breton: Planedenn
planet in Bulgarian: Планета
planet in Catalan: Planeta
planet in Chuvash: Планета
planet in Czech: Planeta
planet in Welsh: Planed
planet in Danish: Planet
planet in German: Planet
planet in Estonian: Planeet
planet in Modern Greek (1453-): Πλανήτης
planet in Spanish: Planeta
planet in Esperanto: Planedo
planet in Basque: Planeta
planet in Persian: سیاره
planet in French: Planète
planet in Western Frisian: Planeet
planet in Friulian: Planet
planet in Irish: Pláinéad
planet in Scottish Gaelic: Planaid
planet in Galician: Planeta
planet in Classical Chinese: 行星
planet in Korean: 행성
planet in Hindi: ग्रह
planet in Croatian: Planet
planet in Ido: Planeto
planet in Indonesian: Planet
planet in Interlingua (International Auxiliary Language Association): Planeta
planet in Icelandic: Reikistjarna
planet in Italian: Pianeta
planet in Hebrew: כוכב לכת
planet in Javanese: Planet
planet in Pampanga: Planeta
planet in Kannada: ಗ್ರಹ
planet in Georgian: პლანეტა
planet in Kazakh: Ғаламшар
planet in Cornish: Planet
planet in Swahili (macrolanguage): Sayari
planet in Kongo: Mweta
planet in Haitian: Planèt
planet in Kurdish: Exter
planet in Latin: Planeta
planet in Latvian: Planēta
planet in Luxembourgish: Planéit
planet in Lithuanian: Planeta
planet in Lingala: Monzɔ́tɔ mwa malíli
planet in Lojban: plini
planet in Hungarian: Bolygó
planet in Macedonian: Планета
planet in Malayalam: ഗ്രഹം
planet in Maltese: Pjaneta
planet in Marathi: ग्रह
planet in Malay (macrolanguage): Planet
planet in Dutch: Planeet
planet in Dutch Low Saxon: Planeet
planet in Japanese: 惑星
planet in Neapolitan: Chianeta
planet in Norwegian: Planet
planet in Norwegian Nynorsk: Planet
planet in Narom: Plianète
planet in Novial: Planete
planet in Occitan (post 1500): Planeta
planet in Uzbek: Sayyora
planet in Low German: Planet
planet in Polish: Planeta
planet in Portuguese: Planeta
planet in Kölsch: Planet (Aßtronomie)
planet in Romanian: Planetă
planet in Quechua: Puriq quyllur
planet in Russian: Планета
planet in Northern Sami: Planehtta
planet in Albanian: Planeti
planet in Sicilian: Pianeta
planet in Simple English: Planet
planet in Slovak: Planéta
planet in Slovenian: Planet
planet in Serbian: Планета
planet in Serbo-Croatian: Planeta
planet in Sundanese: Planét
planet in Finnish: Planeetta
planet in Swedish: Planet
planet in Tagalog: Planeta
planet in Tamil: கோள்
planet in Telugu: గ్రహం
planet in Thai: ดาวเคราะห์
planet in Vietnamese: Hành tinh
planet in Tajik: Сайёра
planet in Tok Pisin: Planet
planet in Turkish: Gezegen
planet in Ukrainian: Планета
planet in Venetian: Pianeta
planet in Walloon: Bole (astronomeye)
planet in Yiddish: פלאנעט
planet in Yoruba: Plánẹ́tì
planet in Contenese: 行星
planet in Chinese: 行星

Synonyms, Antonyms and Related Words

Earth, Jupiter, Mars, Mercury, Neptune, Pluto, Saturn, Uranus, Venus, asteroid, globe, inferior planet, major planet, minor planet, planetoid, secondary planet, solar system, superior planet, terrestrial planet, wanderer, world
Privacy Policy, About Us, Terms and Conditions, Contact Us
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
Material from Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Dict
Valid HTML 4.01 Strict, Valid CSS Level 2.1